Formerly known as Global Research & Risk Solutions

  • Crisil Integral IQ
  • Asset Managers
  • Asset Owners
  • ESG
  • SFDR
  • Sustainable Investment
February 02, 2026 Content Type Blog

SFDR 2.0

February 02, 2026 Content Type Blog

What is changing, why it matters, what comes next

Annmol Mahtani

Annmol Mahtani

Lead Analyst of Sustainability

Crisil Integral IQ

The proposed reset of the European Union's sustainable finance disclosure norms aims for clarity and simplification

 

The European Commission's recent proposal to amend the Sustainability Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), often referred to as SFDR 2.0, aims to address long-standing concerns around complexity, inconsistent interpretation and greenwashing, while making information on sustainability more meaningful and usable for investors.

 

The proposed amendments signal a structural shift away from a disclosure-heavy regime towards clearer product categorisation, stronger anti-greenwashing safeguards and simplified reporting.

 

What are the key updates

From Articles 6/8/9 to product categories

 

One of the most consequential changes proposed is the replacement of the current structure of Articles 6, 8 and 9 with explicit product categories. This is intended to end the market practice of using Articles 8 and 9 as de facto labels, and to bring greater clarity and comparability.

 

Proposed categories

Proposed categories

 

 

This categorisation is designed to be mutually exclusive and more rules-based, reducing the scope for subjective interpretation.

 

Simplified and focused disclosures

 

SFDR 2.0 also proposes a significant simplification of disclosures, responding to widespread industry feedback that the current framework is overly complex and not investor friendly.

 

Key changes

 

 

The intent is to refocus SFDR on providing decision-useful information rather than compliance-driven reporting.

 

Stronger anti-greenwashing safeguards

 

The proposal explicitly aligns SFDR with the European Union’s broader consumer protection and green claims agenda. Sustainability claims must be substantiated, consistent with the product category, and supported by portfolio alignment and exclusions. This reduces the ability to use vague ESG language for products without robust evidence.

 

How do these changes impact market participants

Asset managers: Reclassification and strategy reset

 

For asset managers, SFDR 2.0 is not a ‘re-label and move on’ exercise. It will require a fund-by-fund reassessment against the new category criteria. Products that do not meet the thresholds may fall into the non-classified bucket, losing their ability to be marketed as ESG or sustainability offerings.

 

Strategic implications

Strategic implications

 

 

Asset owners and investors: Better signals, less noise

 

From an investor perspective, SFDR 2.0 aims to restore trust. By tightening criteria, removing vague definitions and strengthening exclusions, the framework seeks to reduce greenwashing and improve the credibility of sustainable products.

 

The clearer differentiation between sustainable, transition and ESG integration strategies should help investors better align portfolios with their values and objectives.

 

When do these changes come into force

SFDR 2.0 is currently in the proposal and consultation phase. Based on the European Commission's process and indicative timelines:

 

  • A final legislative proposal is expected in 2026
  • Formal adoption could follow in 2026–2027
  • Implementation is likely in 2027 or 2028, with a transition period for asset managers to reclassify products and update disclosures

 

While timelines may shift based on political negotiations and industry feedback, firms should not assume long lead times. Given the scale of change, early preparation will be critical.

crisil-loader